Perplexity emphasizes the significance of user feedback in refining its AI, stating that errors are minimal compared to the value offered. The organization acknowledges the necessity of accuracy as AI becomes more integrated into daily life. As it evolves its assistant applications on mobile platforms, Perplexity faces challenges from existing operating systems' restrictions. The article also discusses concerns regarding content usage from publishers and the importance of respecting web protocols, revealing a commitment to balancing operational innovation with ethical considerations.
We welcome this criticism, because it's the best way for us to continually improve. In reality, errors account for a small fraction of results, and our answers are far more accurate than 10 blue links polluted by decades of SEO-optimized content.
Accuracy and trust will only become more important as AI integrates into more of our lives, so this is something we're relentlessly focused on. We can't get there without this feedback.
The Perplexity assistant for Android and iOS seems 'agentic' because it can take actions. How big of a shift is this? AI is pretty good at answering questions now. What really needs to be done is get AI to take actions.
Do Apple and Google have too much control over their mobile platforms compared to outsiders looking to build agents? With iOS it's particularly challenging, because you have to string together a bunch of event APIs.
Collection
[
|
...
]