"Each chronicle was the latest installment in a serial that began in 1492 and extended indefinitely into the future. A full-bearded Englishman (or Dutchman, or Scotsman, or Frenchman) landed on shores where everything was unfamiliar. After trial and triumph, the hero returned home to tell the tale."
"Any chronicle that wound up bound between fly-leaves was first selected by an editor and annotated by a small army of translators and censors. Part of the sport of reading a travelogue was to guess which fantastical claims were true, or at least true to the chronicler's tale, and which were embellished by the folio's editor."
"In an introductory note, the narrator cursed his editors for their 'infernal habit of lying, shuffling, deceiving, and equivocating,' and accused 'your printer' of mangling the text with falsehoods. 'Do these miserable animals presume to think that I am so degenerated as to defend my veracity?'"
Colonial travelogues emerged as a popular genre beginning in the 16th century with Richard Hakluyt's compilations of sailors' accounts. These narratives followed a predictable pattern: explorers encountered unfamiliar lands, overcame challenges, and returned home with stories. However, editors, translators, and censors significantly shaped these published accounts before readers encountered them, making it difficult to distinguish authentic experiences from embellishments. Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels satirized this editorial manipulation in 1726, with the narrator accusing editors and printers of deliberate deception. This historical dynamic parallels contemporary reality television, where ostensibly nonfictional adventure content undergoes similar editorial processes, raising questions about veracity and authenticity in modern media.
#colonial-travelogues #editorial-manipulation #literary-satire #reality-television #narrative-authenticity
Read at Defector
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]