"There's no connection or correlation between people who are achieving ROI and layoffs. Labor reduction is not the best ROI metric. Other factors such as revenue, growth, and time to market are more effective in achieving a strong ROI."
"Those who only look to the workforce tend to be the 'laggards,' because they're not going after the broader set of value that they can get to. This approach can also be very disruptive more broadly."
"Some organizations who cut staff were forced to quickly rehire employees soon after. Instead, organizations with higher levels of return on their spending looked beyond workforce reductions and saw AI as a way to improve employee productivity."
Labor reduction does not correlate with achieving a strong ROI. Effective ROI metrics include revenue, growth, and time to market. Companies focusing solely on workforce cuts are often lagging behind, missing out on broader value opportunities. This approach can lead to disruptions, as some organizations that cut jobs may need to rehire quickly. In contrast, organizations that achieve higher returns on spending leverage AI to enhance employee productivity rather than relying on layoffs.
Read at Computerworld
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]