"There have been many headlines about Tesla's new "Mad Max" mode, but many of those writing about the "dangerous" and "controversial" mode have probably never used it. As a writer, I write about topics I do not have firsthand experience with, but the job requires me to take a fair stance and report what is known. The problem is the nature of driving and driving modes, specifically, is subjective."
"Last week, the NHTSA launched a bit of a probe into Mad Max mode, requesting additional information on the Speed Profile and reiterating that the driver of the car is still required to be in ultimate control. Tesla 'Mad Max' gets its first bit of regulatory attention It's important to keep the latter portion of that sentence in mind for the true thesis of this piece."
"However, this type of drive mode is optional, requires the driver's attention, and should be used responsibly for safe travel. Playing Devil's Advocate, how is Mad Max any different than the performance modes that some sports cars have? Because they require the driver to operate fully, and they are not semi-autonomous like Tesla can offer with Mad Max in Full Self-Driving (Supervised), are they safer?"
Mad Max is an optional, spirited driving profile that requires the driver's attention and is suited for particular situations rather than everyday driving. The NHTSA requested information on the Speed Profile and emphasized that the driver must remain in ultimate control, prompting regulatory scrutiny. Perceptions of the mode vary: some drivers might integrate it into daily habits while others view it as a distinct tool. The safety implications hinge on responsible use, especially when combined with Full Self-Driving (Supervised). Comparisons to sports-car performance modes focus on the difference between full driver operation and semi-autonomous assistance.
Read at TESLARATI
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]