Uar Bernard: the rarest physical specimen' who exposes the NFL's scouting flaws
Briefly

Uar Bernard: the rarest physical specimen' who exposes the NFL's scouting flaws
"A swole 6ft 4in and 306lbs, Uar (pronounced OO-ar) Bernard doesn't just look the part of a fearsome defensive lineman; fans post his shirtless photos next to ones of Myles Garrett, the game-wrecking Cleveland Browns pass rusher who set the regular-season sack record last year. Veteran NFL analyst Lance Zierlein described Bernard as one of the rarest of physical specimens I've seen in the sport."
"Bernard's testing numbers bordered on otherworldly: a 4.63-second 40-yard dash, a 39-inch vertical, the 10ft 10in broad jump or 14in farther than the next-best defensive end prospect. Scouts were awestruck by Bernard's 6% body fat which would be considered low for a marathon runner down from the 11% that he started with at the beginning of his draft training four months earlier."
"Despite this hype, Bernard fell to the seventh round of this year's draft, usually the preserve of players with only a longshot of carving out a long career in the NFL. And he fell that far for a simple reason: he had never played a down of football in his life. The game wasn't available to him in Nigeria, where he grew up."
Uar Bernard has captivated the NFL as a prospect whose physical attributes seem superhuman compared to other professional athletes. Standing 6'4" and weighing 306 pounds with 6% body fat, Bernard posted extraordinary testing numbers including a 4.63-second 40-yard dash, 39-inch vertical, and 10'10" broad jump. Veteran analysts compared him to elite athletes like Myles Garrett and Victor Wembanyama. However, Bernard fell to the seventh round of the draft because he had never played football before, having grown up in Nigeria where the sport was unavailable. The Philadelphia Eagles selected him with the 251st pick, recognizing his potential despite his complete lack of game experience, exemplifying both the promise and limitations of modern scouting.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]