"If we're going to ensure that data more broadly can move across the Atlantic on a sustainable basis, we need to put in place a new type of trans-Atlantic agreement. This agreement needs to protect people's privacy rights pursuant to their own laws, while ensuring that law enforcement can keep the public safe through new international processes to obtain prompt and appropriate access to personal information pursuant to proper legal standards."
"What put the old safe harbor at risk were European concerns about the ability and willingness of U.S. intelligence agencies to scoop up personal data wherever it resides in service to its War on Terror."
"The European court said that the data protection leaders in the E.U.'s two dozen or so constituent countries should manage how companies collect and manage data for their own citizens."
"Some countries-Germany and Switzerland for example-have much stricter rules governing data sovereignty than some of their peers. That sets a whole new level of complexity for vendors that store customer data."
The European Union's top court invalidated legal provisions for tech companies to share customer data across the Atlantic, disrupting longstanding business practices. Microsoft president Brad Smith emphasized the need for a new trans-Atlantic agreement that balances privacy rights with law enforcement needs. The ruling reflects European concerns over U.S. intelligence agencies' data collection practices. Additionally, varying data sovereignty laws among EU countries complicate compliance for companies managing customer data, particularly with stricter regulations in nations like Germany and Switzerland.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]