"The obligation to our national competitiveness and security has led to an unfamiliar political battleground - American families' utility bills. How we satisfy these twin obligations will define how we energize the country for generations to come."
"The decision of the U.S. government to pay a French oil company nearly $1 billion of U.S. taxpayer money NOT to add offshore wind capacity raises a pointed question: what happened to the climate movement?"
"Twenty years ago, the climate movement looked a lot like me - white, coastal, and well-to-do. We shrugged off the prospect of higher electricity bills as a result of more costly renewable power as inconsequential."
The U.S. faces a critical challenge in expanding electricity generation to support AI growth while keeping utility costs manageable for families. Recent geopolitical events have underscored the vulnerability of fossil fuel dependence. A controversial decision to pay a French oil company not to add offshore wind capacity has raised questions about the climate movement's effectiveness. Historically, the movement has been criticized for prioritizing environmental concerns over the financial realities faced by everyday Americans, leading to a disconnect between climate goals and public support.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]