"These phrases seem harmless, but they reveal a deeper issue in higher education and corporate learning alike: many people still don't understand what Instructional Designers actually do. Instructional Design as a profession is often mistaken for graphic design, tech support, or digital formatting. But it's not about making slides look pretty; it's about architecting how people learn. When that expertise is misunderstood or dismissed, the entire learning experience suffers."
"Instructional Design as a profession lives at the intersection of teaching, technology, and psychology, fields that rarely overlap naturally. Instructional Designers translate research into experience, theory into engagement, and content into outcomes. But here's the problem: when Instructional Design is invisible, it's easy to underestimate. Several factors contribute to this ongoing misunderstanding: The work is behind the scenes.When a course runs smoothly, few people think about why."
Instructional Designers architect how people learn by translating research, theory, and content into engaging experiences and measurable outcomes. The profession sits at the intersection of teaching, technology, and psychology, which contributes to role ambiguity where job titles and responsibilities vary across institutions. Much work occurs behind the scenes; smooth course delivery makes design contributions invisible to stakeholders. Mislabeling IDs as graphic designers, tech support, or formatters reduces recognition of learning science expertise and can undermine course quality. Common assumptions include treating designers as visual stylists or technical assistants rather than partners in curriculum design and assessment alignment.
Read at eLearning Industry
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]