"Security doesn't fail at the point of breach. It fails at the point of impact. That line set the tone for this year's Breach and Simulation (BAS) Summit, where researchers, practitioners, and CISOs all echoed the same theme: cyber defense is no longer about prediction. It's about proof. When a new exploit drops, scanners scour the internet in minutes. Once attackers gain a foothold, lateral movement often follows just as fast."
"If your controls haven't been tested against the exact techniques in play, you're not defending, you're hoping things don't go seriously pear-shaped. That's why pressure builds long before an incident report is written. The same hour an exploit hits Twitter, a boardroom wants answers. As one speaker put it, "You can't tell the board, 'I'll have an answer next week.' We have hours, not days.""
"BAS has outgrown its compliance roots and become the daily voltage test of cybersecurity, the current you run through your stack to see what actually holds. This article isn't a pitch or a walkthrough. It's a recap of what came up on stage, in essence, how BAS has evolved from an annual checkbox activity to a simple and effective everyday way of proving that your defenses are actually working."
Cyber defense must prove effectiveness through active, continuous testing rather than prediction or checklist compliance. When exploits appear, automated scans and rapid lateral movement can outpace untested controls, creating immediate pressure for answers. Breach and attack simulation (BAS) operates as a daily voltage test that runs safe, controlled adversarial behaviors in live environments to validate detection and response. BAS emphasizes reaction testing over architectural certification, converting pentest snapshots into continuous proof that defenses actually respond under real techniques and time-sensitive conditions. Boards demand answers within hours, not days, so defenses need validated, actionable proof in real time.
Read at The Hacker News
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]