Recent rulings have favored certain Biglaw firms in their disputes against unconstitutional executive orders, leading to a sense of victory among those supporting legal integrity. This situation is causing clients to reconsider their relationships with firms that have not demonstrated tenacity, as they question the commitment of these firms to advocate for them. The article reflects on the upcoming historical narrative shaped by journalists as we navigate these turbulent times, emphasizing the interconnectedness between law and journalism in the era of misinformation.
The good folks win occasionally, and recently, some Biglaw firms have pushed back against unconstitutional executive orders, signaling resilience and commitment to their clients.
As clients begin to question the tenacity of Biglaw firms, there’s a risk of losing business due to the perception that firms are not fighting for survival.
The historical narrative shaped by journalists will define how future generations interpret the actions and legacy of the current administration, post-January 20, 2025.
The rise of 'fake news' and unsocial media has created a fascinating intersection between journalism and law, impacting public perception and legal narratives.
Collection
[
|
...
]