Google's AI Summary Invents State Ethics Rules... And It's Not A Hallucination Problem - Above the Law
Briefly

Google's AI Summary Invents State Ethics Rules... And It's Not A Hallucination Problem - Above the Law
"Google's AI-generated summary claims that as of August 2024, Pennsylvania mandates explicit disclosure of AI use in all court submissions, which is entirely false."
"The Legal AI Governance tracker, maintained by Brian Alenduff, clarifies that there is no statewide rule in Pennsylvania regarding mandatory AI disclosure in court filings."
"Joint Formal Opinion 2024-200 from the Pennsylvania Bar Association flags AI as a competence issue but states it is advisory only and not binding."
"The ABA's 50-state survey classifies Pennsylvania as 'court dependent,' indicating that disclosure policies vary by individual court rather than being uniform statewide."
Google's AI summary incorrectly states that Pennsylvania mandates disclosure of AI use in court filings as of August 2024. In reality, there is no statewide rule. The Legal AI Governance tracker indicates that while there are standing orders in some courtrooms and an advisory ethics opinion from the Pennsylvania Bar Association, these do not constitute binding rules. The state is classified as 'court dependent' by the ABA, meaning disclosure policies vary by court. The misinformation likely originated from a vendor blog post.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]