"Whether you're cross-examining or putting forth an expert witness, effectively managing their testimony is a difficult task. Experts must garner the respect of the judge and jury while also defending their own credibility - a precarious balancing act, particularly when faced with effective cross-examination. In this webinar, Above the Law's Bob Ambrogi is joined by litigator Ryan Baker of Waymaker LLP and Dr. Tom Smith of Emory University, an experienced expert witness, to explore all things expert testimony in 2026. You can register to view the full webinar on-demand here (CLE is available), and read on for some highlights from the discussion."
"The Importance of Being 'Reasonable' Experts can harm their own credibility when they seem closed off to opposing perspectives, Ryan notes. Here, he shares some thoughts on that dynamic."
Managing expert testimony requires balancing credibility-building with responsiveness to opposing perspectives and clear communication to judges and juries. Effective experts present reasoned opinions, translate specialized jargon into accessible terms for factfinders, and anticipate rigorous cross-examination. Lawyers should prepare experts thoroughly, use deposition techniques to lock in testimony, and practice translating technical points into persuasive narratives. Cross-examiners employ targeted strategies to undermine credibility, while expert witnesses defend methodology and impartiality. Emerging trends include increased use of technology in expert preparation and courtroom presentation, and continuing emphasis on demonstrable qualifications, methodological transparency, and demeanor that fosters respect from factfinders.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]