"The conference proceeded at a breathless pace. Three full days of content from morning to night. Even with breaks the pace was pretty exhausting."
"A substantial amount of content was directed toward how attendees could convince the lawyers for whom they work to do what they think the lawyers ought to be doing."
"Implicit in this was the suggestion that they know more than the lawyers about what's good for them. That undercurrent is understandable, occurs at lots of legal tech conferences, and is often well deserved."
The conference successfully upheld its intimate nature, promoting networking among attendees and vendors. However, the event's rapid pace over three days was exhausting, leaving little time for leisure. A significant portion of the content focused on how attendees could influence lawyers, creating an 'us versus them' dynamic. This perspective often lacked input from senior lawyers, which could have enriched the discussions. Despite these issues, the overall experience was deemed worthwhile and successful.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]