"Kash Patel's two-hundred-and-fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against The Atlantic, on claims that the magazine defamed the F.B.I. director in an article that alleges on-duty inebriation and other misconduct by Patel. Bertoni and Foggatt examine the legal rationale behind Patel's accusations, and the questions that the case raises about the use of anonymous sources, by The Atlantic and other publications."
"Patel's suit fits into President Donald Trump's long-standing litigious relationship with the press, and the broader wave of lawsuits that Trump has brought against media organizations. Will these cases influence the kind of reporting that outlets are willing to publish, let alone pursue? Bertoni and Foggatt consider whether existing press protections are strong enough to withstand the mounting legal attacks."
Fabio Bertoni, The New Yorker's general counsel, and Tyler Foggatt discuss Kash Patel's $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic over an article alleging on-duty inebriation and misconduct by the FBI director. The conversation examines the legal arguments underlying Patel's claims and scrutinizes the use of anonymous sources by The Atlantic and other publications. The discussion contextualizes this suit within President Trump's broader pattern of litigation against media organizations and explores whether such cases may deter outlets from pursuing or publishing certain stories. Bertoni and Foggatt assess whether existing legal protections for the press remain adequate against mounting legal challenges from political figures.
Read at The New Yorker
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]