"The New York Rangers claim to be in a retool, but many believe they are or should be in a rebuild. The major difference is that a retool works to return to contention quickly, while a rebuild is methodically drawn out to develop the best possible long term result, regardless of how long it takes. The question isn't as simple as should the Rangers rebuild or retool."
"Rebuild: This team Is terrible: Let's be real, the Rangers aren't one or two pieces away. With that, it doesn't make sense to try to fix the team's problems on the fly, as that would be a lot of heavy lifting with few assets. Sure, the Rangers will get assets from trades they make this season, but flipping those assets could put the organization in the exact same spot they're already in. It's a no-brainer, right?"
"Retool: Igor Shesterkin and Adam Fox exist: Two of the best players in the world at their respective positions play for the New York Rangers. Yes, the Rangers are far from contention. Also yes, the Rangers filled two of the biggest checklist items in being true contenders. This complicates the equation, as unless the Rangers trade one or both, the Rangers not only have elite players, but also elite players other players likely want to play with."
New York Rangers face a strategic choice between a retool aimed at returning to contention quickly and a rebuild focused on methodical long-term development. The current roster is not one or two pieces away from contention, making quick fixes risky and potentially leaving the organization in the same position. Elite goaltender Igor Shesterkin and defenseman Adam Fox provide foundational building blocks and complicate decisions because they attract other players. Declining free-agent opportunities reduce obvious short-term options. Uncertainty about future roster moves and unpredictable changes in the hockey landscape make timing and approach the central dilemma.
Read at Blue Seat Blogs
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]