"Congress is flying blind on the effectiveness of the laws it creates. That's the thesis of a new project released last week by the POPVOX Foundation, a nonpartisan nonprofit, based on the input of 50 federal employees pushed out of their government jobs last year. The intent of this work was partly to gather insights on how policy implementation works in the executive branch and what barriers exist to effective government that lawmakers may not know about."
"Communication between those making laws and those implementing them has been a problem for a long time, said Meeker, in part because federal employees doing the work aren't usually authorized to go talk to Congress about what they may be dealing with as they turn statute into reality. That made last year a unique opportunity, as federal employees left the government en masse under the Trump administration's efforts to shrink the size of the federal workforce."
"Typically, Congress' current mechanisms for feedback from those closest to implementation in the government are limited. Hearings "are performative as often as they are informative," the new report reads. Audits from the Government Accountability Office are usually retrospective, and congressionally-mandated reports are often compliance exercises."
"Federal agencies have legislative affairs offices, but the information they transmit to Congress often gets filtered down to politics and top-level priorities, not the "program-level, operational oversights [of] what's working, what's breaking, what statutory language creates unnecessary friction," the new report reads. The hope is that Congress may replicate POPVOX's process, or parts of it -"
Congress lacks clear visibility into whether laws function effectively after implementation. A project based on input from federal employees who left government jobs gathered insights into how policy becomes reality in the executive branch and what barriers reduce effectiveness. Communication between lawmakers and implementers is constrained because federal employees are often not authorized to speak with Congress about operational challenges. Existing feedback channels are limited: hearings can be performative, audits tend to be retrospective, and required reports often focus on compliance. Legislative affairs offices may filter information toward political priorities rather than detailed program-level operational problems, including what works, what breaks, and where statutory language creates friction. The goal is to show what structured feedback processes could enable for lawmakers.
#congressional-oversight #policy-implementation #federal-workforce #government-accountability #legislative-executive-communication
Read at Nextgov.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]