"Even some sort of really remarkable and extraordinary revelation would certainly not satisfy the social-media-verse. 'Hey, is this another hoax? Is this another game that the government is playing with us? What else are they keeping from us?' I don't foresee almost any way for this thing to be definitively resolved in terms of the public interest."
"UAP can be a number of things. It's not like they are all in one bucket. Many of them actually are, in time, cleared up. Some of them, maybe, were balloons, airplanes, or some atmospheric phenomenon that we don't know about. Then, yes, there is a small category where it is still not clear what they are."
"The CIA report in 1997 said the Air Force had made misleading and deceptive statements to the public in order to allay public fears and to protect an extraordinarily sensitive national security project."
Government releases of UAP files face significant credibility challenges due to widespread public distrust and conspiracy theories on social media. Historical precedent suggests new disclosures would focus on UAP sightings and government tracking programs like Project Blue Book and recent Pentagon videos. Most UAP phenomena are eventually explained as balloons, aircraft, or atmospheric events, though a small category remains unexplained. Government reports consistently state no evidence supports extraterrestrial origins. Past disclosures have included admissions of deception, such as the CIA's 1997 acknowledgment that the Air Force made misleading statements to protect classified projects. Even extraordinary revelations are unlikely to resolve public skepticism.
Read at WIRED
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]