What Is the Point of California's Privacy Laws if Big Tech Ignores Them? | KQED
Briefly

What Is the Point of California's Privacy Laws if Big Tech Ignores Them? | KQED
"Google's failure to honor the [Global Privacy Control] opt-out signal is easy to find in network traffic. This non-compliance is easy to spot, hiding in plain sight."
"Consumer privacy is a top priority for us, and we remain committed to transparency and compliance with applicable privacy requirements. When we receive a GPC signal, we opt the user out of sharing personal data with third parties for personalized advertising."
"Their claims that I 'misunderstood' anything are farcical. I wrote the cookie policy. If you make them change the code, the whole system falls apart, and that's what they're terrified of."
Google has been found to not honor the Global Privacy Control opt-out signal, which is easily detectable in network traffic. Microsoft claims to comply with privacy requirements by opting users out of data sharing when receiving a GPC signal. However, Google disputes this, stating that the report reflects a misunderstanding of their operations. Violations of the California Consumer Privacy Act can incur significant fines, but companies may not change practices due to their financial capacity. The California Department of Justice is open to reports of potential violations.
Read at Kqed
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]