The article discusses the fragile boundary between conviction and partisanship, highlighting the importance of self-questioning in political discourse. It uses the Iraq War as a case study, illustrating how proponents ignored credible dissenting voices, damaging their ideological credibility. The article also mentions current economic debates, specifically tariffs, where various stakeholders have shifted positions amidst changing circumstances. The piece emphasizes that lack of introspection in political stances can lead to larger systemic failures, advocating for an open dialogue that considers multiple viewpoints rather than staunch adherence to partisan lines.
There's a fine line between conviction and partisanship. A helpful rubric is whether you have stopped asking the question, What if we're wrong?
The Iraq War is an example of choice around The American Conservative's offices, for good reason. That misadventure's architects ignored credible criticisms of the project from start to finish.
Jamie Dimon...was broadly supportive of the Trump tariff policy at the beginning of the administration. Lately, however, he has argued that the iteration we got is misguided.
Of course, nobody has the market cornered on this kind of thing.
Collection
[
|
...
]