"But for-loops do something subtle: they ask us to think about how work is performed rather than what the work represents. Before we can express a business rule, we must decide: how to iterate, where to accumulate results, when to branch, which state to mutate, and how the structure should evolve over time. All of that comes before we say anything meaningful about the domain."
"In digital commerce systems - where carts, items, shipments, promotions, and repricing pipelines must be transformed repeatedly - this focus on mechanics becomes especially costly. The more moving parts we introduce, the more our mental energy is spent on machinery rather than logic. However, Scala's map, filter, and flatMap offer a different path. They remove the machinery entirely, leaving only the business rule itself."
Developers often retain imperative for-loops because they are the first structure learned and feel intuitive for iterating collections. For-loops force consideration of iteration mechanics: how to iterate, where to accumulate results, when to branch, which state to mutate, and how structures evolve over time. This mechanical focus precedes expressing domain logic and increases cognitive load, especially in digital commerce where carts, items, shipments, promotions, and repricing pipelines require repeated transformations. Scala's higher-order functions—map, filter, and flatMap—remove iteration machinery and mutable accumulators, allowing code to state selection and transformation rules directly and reducing mental overhead.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]