EE, Three claim UK's best mobile internet performance in 2025 | Computer Weekly
Briefly

EE, Three claim UK's best mobile internet performance in 2025 | Computer Weekly
"The nPerf Speed Test analysed the overall quality of the connection experienced by UK mobile users across all four quarters of 2025, considering several criteria, namely download speed, upload speed, latency, browsing performance and streaming quality. Measurements were based on 57,299 tests conducted via the nPerf application on both Android and iOS devices. Download speeds above 25 Mbps were classified as excellent, and a latency of 0-30 ms was considered excellent, enabling activities such as 4K video streaming and real-time interaction,"
"Overall, EE and Three were found to have tied for leadership with both operators delivering download speeds exceeding 110 Mbps, supporting what were described as "comprehensive" user experiences. Both EE and Three Users were seen as benefiting from high-quality mobile experiences, particularly for streaming, gaming and real-time communications. EE's performance was rated as having "comprehensive strengths" and demonstrating "strong performances" across all metrics."
nPerf measured UK mobile connection quality across all four quarters of 2025 using 57,299 Android and iOS tests. Metrics included download speed, upload speed, latency, browsing performance and streaming quality. Download speeds above 25 Mbps and latencies of 0–30 ms were classified as excellent, enabling 4K streaming and real-time interaction. Browsing and streaming scores between 75% and 100% indicated near-instant page loading and smooth streaming, 50–75% was adequate for YouTube, and below 50% led to compromised video quality. EE and Three tied for leadership, both delivering download speeds above 110 Mbps and high-quality experiences for streaming, gaming and real-time communications. EE recorded 86,470 nPoints with 110.44 Mbps download and 15.77 Mbps upload, and browsing and streaming scores reported at 69.65% and 76.51% respectively.
Read at ComputerWeekly.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]