Whoever wins today's elections, democracy is the loser under first past the post | Polly Toynbee
Briefly

Whoever wins today's elections, democracy is the loser under first past the post | Polly Toynbee
"More results than ever will involve the winning party getting a disproportionate amount of power, considering the number of votes cast for it; fewer people will get what they voted for. The ever more random roulette wheel of our voting system will produce wildly odd winners and losers."
"Our never-fit-for-purpose first-past-the-post system breaks apart under the strain of having five or sometimes six parties bunched together with no more than 11 percentage points between them in the polls. A vote share of less than 20% may secure a win."
"Look how bad the last local elections were: in 2024, Tories in Broxbourne, Hertfordshire, scored 90% of the seats with 50.5% of the vote. Lewisham became a one-party Labour state with not one opposition councillor in 2022, on just 55.4% of the vote."
The first-past-the-post electoral system is fundamentally broken when multiple parties compete closely without clear dominance. Recent local elections demonstrate severe distortions: parties winning under 56% of votes secured complete control with zero opposition representation. With five or six parties now competing within narrow polling margins, vote shares below 20% can secure victories. The electorate seeks precise representation but the system thwarts this intent. While multi-party choice represents progress from the 1950s two-party dominance, current fragmentation produces grotesque results including no-overall-control councils. Concerns arise about potential alliances, particularly between Conservatives and Reform, which could undermine democratic safeguards against extremist political movements gaining influence.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]