Liz Kendall's announcement to review the state pension age has sparked strong reactions from readers, particularly among older workers and pensioners concerned about unfair reforms. Many are opposed to another increase in retirement age, emphasizing the physical challenges faced by manual laborers. Critics argue that saving for retirement is only feasible for the wealthy, leaving many feeling punished by a system where their contributions yield insufficient support. Commenters express frustration over being advised to retire with nothing, highlighting growing discontent among future pensioners regarding the adequacy and fairness of the current pension framework.
Liz Kendall's announcement of a new review into the state pension age has drawn a strong response from readers, who feel increasingly squeezed by reforms they see as unfair and unrealistic.
Many took issue with the idea of raising the retirement age again, warning that it fails to account for physical decline, especially among manual workers.
Several readers questioned Ms. Kendall's assertion that future pensioners should take heed and save more, with many pointing out that saving is only an option for the wealthy.
A recurring theme was frustration at a system seen to punish those who had done everything right, only to be left with little support.
Collection
[
|
...
]