Campaign consultants and local officials argue that ballot wording for local measures restricts clear explanation of taxpayer costs. The Fremont Unified School District's Measure M, a $919 million bond proposal, exemplifies this confusion. Current wording complicates the understanding of the bond's costs and intended use of funds. A proposed bill, AB 699, could worsen the situation by further obscuring tax implications. Simplified wording that clarifies the bond's financial requirements and oversight is necessary for informed voter decision-making.
In 2024, the Fremont Unified School District placed Measure M, a $919 million bond proposal, on the ballot. It faces scrutiny over unclear wording that obscures financial implications for taxpayers.
Current ballot wording combines multiple objectives, making it difficult for voters to understand the bond's cost and the purpose of funds. This complexity may deter informed voting.
Collection
[
|
...
]