"Allen's social media posts were typical of outrage culture, where expressions of disgust are common and polarization is prevalent. He expressed disdain for political figures and their actions, reflecting a broader societal trend."
"In his manifesto, Allen stated that he aimed to kill Trump-administration officials, viewing attendees of a speech as complicit in their actions. He framed his political disagreements as moral failures."
"Allen argued that the constitutional order had been upended, claiming that the United States is ruled by law, not individuals. He believed that when representatives do not follow the law, citizens are not obligated to comply."
Cole Tomas Allen, accused of attempting to assassinate President Trump, engaged with political news on social media, expressing outrage and anger. His posts mirrored common sentiments on these platforms, where disgust and polarization thrive. In a manifesto, he justified his intentions by framing political disagreements as moral failures, targeting Trump officials and attendees at a speech. He claimed the social contract was broken, asserting that the law should govern, not individuals, and that complicity existed among those who supported the administration.
Read at The Atlantic
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]