National Review and The Wall Street Journal published editorials rejecting claims by President Trump and Tulsi Gabbard regarding a treasonous conspiracy involving former President Obama. They acknowledged Trump as a victim of a significant political trick involving the Clinton campaign's use of the Steele dossier, which contributed to the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. While noting that Russia attempted to interfere in the election, they clarified that Trump and Gabbard mischaracterized key elements of that narrative, particularly regarding Russian operations and the scope of intelligence assessments from the Obama administration.
Both National Review and The Wall Street Journal have new editorials rejecting President Donald Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's assertion that former President Barack Obama and senior officials within his administration were part of a treasonous conspiracy against Trump.
The editorial acknowledged that Trump was the victim of one of the most insidious dirty tricks in American political history, where the Clinton campaign used the bogus Steele dossier to manufacture the Trump-Russia collusion narrative.
Trump and Gabbard treat the accurate portion of the Democratic narrative as though it too were a fiction. Russia did indeed try to interfere in the election.
The faux suspicions of Trump-Russia collusion were thus tucked neatly into an overarching probe of Russian cyberespionage against the United States.
Collection
[
|
...
]