"I tuned in to the @60minutes Trump interview with low expectations, and I haven't bern surprised. Norah let Trump lie and lie with barely any pushback or provision of corrective facts. Where is the Aussie guy from @axios when we need him? Joy-Ann Reid (@joyannreid.bsky.social) November 2, 2025 at 7:52 PM In a later post, she added: Norah has given up even trying to do an interview and is now just trying to be friends. I'm done."
"CBS's parent company Paramount settled the suit in July, paying the president $16 million. Every second counts on a show like 60 Minutes, he wrote. Segments are usually edited and polished to perfection. But editing is what exposed CBS to Trump's wrath last year Indeed, it was the portions of the interview CBS chose not to air that garnered the most attention from the public."
Internet reaction surged after the 60 Minutes interview with President Donald Trump, with critics on the left faulting anchor Norah O'Donnell for not sufficiently challenging repeated false statements. Prominent voices on social platforms accused O'Donnell of allowing lies without corrective facts and of adopting an overly cordial approach. Some outlets observed that the interview asked substantive questions and occasionally pressed Trump while offering limited direct rebuttal. CNN's Brian Stelter argued the exchange was not purely cushy and emphasized how editing shapes perception. The piece noted Trump's prior lawsuit over a selectively edited segment and Paramount's $16 million settlement, and highlighted that unaired portions attracted significant attention.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]