Prediction markets are playing a dangerous game
Briefly

Prediction markets are playing a dangerous game
"This past weekend, after the United States and Israel went to war with Iran, leading prediction market platforms Kalshi and Polymarket erupted with activity. That included extremely contentious markets around the death of Iran's supreme leader, and some that appeared to be rife with insider trading from people with advanced knowledge of US military actions."
"In 2026, you can, from the comfort of your couch, wager on when the US will bomb a foreign country. And for Kalshi and Polymarket, that's quite literally the business model: betting on anything. (After we recorded this episode, Polymarket even briefly featured a wager on whether nuclear war would break out before 2027; the company removed it.)"
"Prediction market players want to be the news, and they've even devised new, frankly unconvincing frameworks for why they should be considered legitimate sources of information - instead of just anything-goes casinos. Yet more and more, news organizations are taking the bait."
Prediction markets have become increasingly prominent in news cycles, with platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket enabling users to wager on geopolitical events, military actions, and political outcomes. Following the US-Israel conflict with Iran, these platforms saw surges in activity including markets on Iran's supreme leader's death, with evidence suggesting insider trading from individuals with advanced knowledge of military operations. While these companies generate substantial revenue from sports betting, they face regulatory scrutiny from state gambling authorities. The platforms position themselves as legitimate information sources rather than casinos, though this framing appears unconvincing. Their business models explicitly incentivize insider trading, creating predictable legal and ethical problems.
Read at The Verge
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]