"Ratcliffe's report indicates that Obama-era national-security leaders fostered a politically charged environment that undermined the credibility of assessments regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election."
"The report criticizes the intelligence assessment's drafting process, noting it occurred over a few weeks and lacked a comprehensive interagency review, limiting scrutiny of sensitive information."
CIA Director John Ratcliffe's recent report claims that the CIA's analysis of Russian interference in the 2016 election was compromised by political motivations among national-security leaders during the Obama era. Ratcliffe contends that the credibility of these intelligence assessments is diminished due to a rushed draft process, involvement of politically biased figures, limited access to sensitive information, and inadequate interagency review. These allegations of intentional misconduct are significant but remain unsupported by substantial evidence within the report.
Read at The Atlantic
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]