The Trump administration is appealing several court rulings that declared executive orders against law firms like Perkins Coie and Jenner & Block unconstitutional. This approach reflects a larger strategy where legal actions are viewed primarily as political advocacy tools rather than adherence to legality. By appealing these decisions, the administration aims to maintain its narrative and intimidate opposition lawyers, leveraging the support of the Supreme Court to twist straightforward legal assessments into complex outcomes.
The Trump administration's approach to legal actions departs significantly from prior administrations, prioritizing political advocacy over legality and viewing constitutional violations as acceptable if they serve a narrative.
Every appeal against court rulings, despite a string of losses, is a strategic move aimed at maintaining a narrative and intimidating legal representatives of political adversaries.
Collection
[
|
...
]