The Nationals' recent performance shows a 1-5 run, leading to low expectations for improvement under current management. In the draft, the team selected Eli Willitis as their #1 pick, who is viewed as a safe choice without standout talent like previous years. Willitis is seen as having potential to be a solid top player or a super-sub, contrasting with other options like Ethan Holliday, who had more risk and volatility. This selection indicates a shift in draft strategy towards stabilizing the team's depth rather than aiming for high-ceiling talent alone.
The Nationals struggled with a 1-5 run, facing tough teams indicating that the current squad remains unchanged under its management, expecting no miracles.
Eli Willitis was chosen as the Nats’ #1 draft pick despite no clear generational talents, with the potential to be a solid top player or super-sub.
Selecting Willitis over Ethan Holliday reflects a shift in draft strategy, moving from high-risk, high-reward picks to safer options to replenish team depth.
Rizzo's approach included taking chances on high-talent players; however, accumulating misses has left the organization with limited depth in the minors.
Collection
[
|
...
]