"The three approaches on three consecutive days do have something in common. They are all attempts to wrestle with the same set of hard facts: the regime in Iran is unlikely to collapse or surrender the right to enrich uranium no matter how many bombs are dropped on it, Tehran has shown its capacity to close the strait of Hormuz, and a total blockade of the Gulf hurts the US economy as well as Iran."
"Together these hard facts make up the sides of a steel box in which the Trump administration, largely through its own actions, finds itself trapped. The repeated policy changes in recent days show him flailing around inside this trap, pinging off the walls and looking for an exit other than humiliation or a forever war."
"His accompanying threat of bombardment at a much higher level and intensity if Iran does not accept the initial terms betrays his nervousness it will not work."
The Trump administration rapidly shifts between three policy approaches toward Iran across consecutive days: military escalation demanding higher costs, Project Freedom to counter Iran's strait control, and peace negotiations. These fluctuating strategies reflect underlying constraints: Iran will not abandon uranium enrichment or relinquish strait control regardless of military pressure, and a total Gulf blockade damages the US economy alongside Iran's. These hard facts create a strategic trap limiting viable options. The administration appears caught between avoiding humiliation, preventing prolonged conflict, and achieving substantive concessions. Recent reports indicate negotiations may produce a one-page memorandum declaring war's end and establishing a 30-day negotiating period, though Trump's accompanying bombardment threats suggest uncertainty about success.
#iran-nuclear-policy #strait-of-hormuz #trump-foreign-policy #us-iran-negotiations #military-strategy
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]