"For Plato, psyche meant something like what we'd now call mind -understood as a complex system requiring governance. The psyche had distinct parts: a reasoning part that deliberates, a spirited part that feels emotion and courage, and an appetitive part that desires. Each part has its own function and its own form of excellence. And crucially, these parts need to be governed-integrated under what Plato called constitutional self-rule."
"They chose psychology-from the Greek psyche. Not animology-from the Latin anima. This wasn't arbitrary. Despite two thousand years of Latin philosophical and theological tradition, the Latin word couldn't carry the meaning. The founders sensed that anima (soul) had become too focused on questions of substance and destiny-what the soul is and where it goes-rather than questions of structure and function. Psyche pointed toward something that could be mapped: a system with architecture."
Greek psyche described mind as an organized, functional system requiring governance and integration of distinct parts: reason, spirit, and appetite, each with specific functions and excellences. Roman translation as anima reframed mind as breath or life-force, focusing on substance and destiny rather than structure, removing concepts of parts and self-governance. Nineteenth-century founders of the scientific study of mind chose psychology from the Greek term because psyche suggested mappable architecture, while anima evoked metaphysical questions. The Greek term survived in name, but Latin conceptual habits continued to influence thinking, creating a persistent mismatch between word and model.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]