#spam-filtering

[ follow ]
#email-delivery #asynchronous-bounces #backscatter #email-systems #akismet #blogging #python #api #rcs-messaging
Deliverability
fromWordtothewise
1 week ago

DKIM2, Asynchronous Bounces and VERP

Asynchronous bounces can lead to backscatter, causing unrelated recipients to receive bounce messages for emails they never sent.
fromJames Bennett
1 month ago

Rewriting a 20-year-old Python library

Akismet launched in 2005 as a web service to classify user-generated content as spam or not, quickly gaining popularity among bloggers facing spam issues.
Privacy technologies
fromTechCrunch
2 months ago

Google looks to tackle longstanding RCS spam in India - but not alone | TechCrunch

We had not onboarded Google because we first wanted RCS messages to be routed through the Airtel spam filter. Under the partnership, Airtel's network intelligence will be combined with Google's RCS platform to enable real-time checks on business messaging, including sender verification, spam detection, and enforcement of users' do-not-disturb preferences.
Privacy professionals
Information security
fromThe Verge
3 months ago

Gmail's spam filter and automatic sorting are broken

Gmail is displaying warnings that messages haven't been scanned for spam or harmful software; users should exercise extra caution while engineers investigate.
Information security
fromSocial Media Explorer
4 months ago

How Spam Filtering Protects You from Phishing and Malware - Social Media Explorer

Spam filtering protects inboxes by using layered checks—sender reputation, content and technical analysis—to block phishing, malware, and other malicious emails before delivery.
Music
fromZDNET
7 months ago

Spotify cracks down on AI 'slop' - these are the changes you'll see

Spotify will label AI-generated music, remove unauthorized impersonations of artist voices, and deploy stronger spam filters to protect artists and users.
fromWordtothewise
7 months ago

Changes happen, even if you don't keep up

The problem is that the person asking the question is only looking at things from their own perspective. They didn't change anything, so of course nothing changed. This point of view is inherently self-centered, thinking that the only thing that matters is the sender. It demonstrates a failure to understand one of the core concepts of SMTP. Each side of a SMTP transaction pays for email.
Deliverability
[ Load more ]