#supreme-court

#supreme-court

Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered Jair Bolsonaro to wear an ankle bracelet and prohibited him from using social media after he allegedly planned a coup against President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.

Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch is categorized as a SLAPP suit, indicating an attempt to silence critics and discourage free speech.

Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson's dissents signal a rejection of traditional constitutional law practices, highlighting a new reality where the Court seems unmoored from legal restraint.

Tennessee's SB-1 asserts the state's compelling interest in encouraging minors to appreciate their sex and discourages anything that might make them become disdainful of their sex.

Jessica Winter describes the Supreme Court's decision to allow dismantling the Department of Education as cruel and nihilistic sabotage.

The Supreme Court's decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton does not allow states or the federal government to impose broader age-verification mandates on social media, general audience websites, or app stores. This ruling reverses decades of First Amendment protections for adults to access lawful speech online, affecting not just minors but adult access to various types of speech that were previously protected.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissents at the Supreme Court have become pivotal, especially her insights into the influence of specific industries on court decisions.

"Five states are feigning compliance with Tyler by requiring owners well before any tax sale to preserve their right to any surplus proceeds from any future sale."

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recently criticized the Supreme Court for being "overly sympathetic to corporate interests" and favoring "moneyed interests" over ordinary citizens.

"This is very worrying, because if past is prologue, it may suggest that they are preparing to eliminate or emasculate the committee," Peter Lurie, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, told The New York Times.

Judge Susan Illston emphasized her intent to litigate the legality of individual agency workforce reduction plans. The Supreme Court's ruling allowed mass layoffs but did not rule on individual plans.

Andrew Oldham, a Trump appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, has faced humiliation at the Supreme Court with five recent reversals by a lopsided majority.

Jackson's concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company v. Sawyer established a crucial principle against one-man rule, emphasizing that governance must operate under laws rather than individual authority.

Over the past half century, the Supreme Court has continually twisted the Constitution into a document that is implacably hostile to workers.

The film "Chinatown" showcases a narrative where the protagonist confronts a powerful adversary representing deep-rooted corruption, ultimately leading to despair regarding the possibility of justice.

The Supreme Court decision in A.J.T. v. Osseo Community School District allows students with disabilities to fight discrimination in schools without facing higher legal standards than other settings.