Generations interact with AI in distinct ways, affecting its usage. Older individuals often utilize it similarly to search engines, while younger people see it as a life advisor or a multifaceted tool. This discrepancy in application raises questions about varying AI models. Each AI was prompted to evaluate its capabilities and those of its competitors. Further analysis included self-assessments from LLMs, which criticized their own responses and assessed their overall effectiveness in representing their interests.
Older people use ChatGPT like Google. People in their 20s and 30s use it as a life advisor. College students use it like an operating system.
The vast disparity in use cases among generations and individuals led to an analysis of the distinctions among AI models and their unique functionalities.
Each AI model was asked to identify its strengths and weaknesses as well as those of its competitors, highlighting their competitive landscape.
LLMs critiqued the survey results, assessing which provided the best and worst answers and how well they represented their own platforms.
Collection
[
|
...
]