NYT Names Adam Back As Bitcoin's Creator. Back Says No
Briefly

NYT Names Adam Back As Bitcoin's Creator. Back Says No
"I'm not satoshi, but I was early in laser focus on the positive societal implications of cryptography, online privacy and electronic cash, hence my ~1992 onwards active interest in applied research on ecash, privacy tech on cypherpunks list which led to hashcash and other ideas."
"The rest is a combination of coincidence and similar phrases from people with similar experience and interests."
"Because he wrote at length on the cypherpunks mailing list about electronic cash and privacy from around 1992 onward, he argued, his old writing is simply easier to match against Satoshi's than the writing of contributors who posted far less."
An investigation claims Adam Back is a strong candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto, the Bitcoin creator. Back denies these claims multiple times, emphasizing his early interest in cryptography and electronic cash. The investigation uses textual analysis of emails and forum posts, noting similarities in writing patterns. Back acknowledges some overlaps but argues they stem from his extensive contributions to discussions on electronic cash. He clarifies a specific comment misinterpreted as a slip, stating it was about confirmation bias, not a disclosure of identity.
Read at Bitcoin Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]