"The gap between a clean patch report and a secure environment is where most of the real risk lives. Misconfigured systems, outdated access permissions, and network segments set up during an acquisition and never reviewed again will never show up in a patch report."
"According to Zero Day Clock, last year, the window between a vulnerability being disclosed and active exploitation was around 23 days. That window is now closer to 15 hours."
"The patch-first model assumed defenders would always have enough time to respond, and that has not been true for a while now. By the time you're ready to act, the vulnerability is already being exploited."
"The security incidents I see in enterprise environments rarely trace back to a sophisticated attacker who found something no one else had noticed. They usually trace back to operational problems."
Relying solely on patch rates can mislead security teams, as real risks often stem from misconfigured systems and outdated access permissions. The gap between patch reports and actual security is significant. The time between vulnerability disclosure and exploitation has drastically decreased, now averaging around 15 hours. This rapid pace means that traditional patch-first models are ineffective, as vulnerabilities are often exploited before patches can be deployed. The rise of AI in vulnerability discovery is expected to exacerbate this issue.
Read at Securitymagazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]