The US Supreme Court has granted the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) access to the Social Security Administration's sensitive personal data while a legal challenge unfolds. This decision reverses a previous ruling by Judge Ellen Hollander, who blocked Doge's access based on potential violations of federal privacy laws. The court's move, favoring Doge during the litigation, aligns with the agency's controversial push championed by Donald Trump to streamline federal operations. Critics argue this decision compromises the privacy of millions, illustrating tensions between efficiency reforms and privacy rights.
The court's unsigned order did not provide a rationale for siding with Doge, highlighting the lack of reasoned judgment in allowing access to sensitive data.
Hollander had previously ruled that Doge's unfettered access likely would violate federal privacy laws, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding personal information.
The legal challenge has brought attention to the concerns about Doge's access to sensitive data and the implications for millions of American's privacy.
Doge's controversial access to Social Security Administration data systems has ignited debates on government efficiency versus the protection of personal information.
Collection
[
|
...
]