"The event was part of the 'From Dissent to Dialogue' series, which aimed to bring together law scholars from differing ideological perspectives to debate the legitimacy of the Supreme Court."
"Law School Dean John C.P. Goldberg stated that the event was 'exactly what was envisioned' for the fund, emphasizing the importance of getting people together who disagree to learn from each other."
"Derek Muller, a Federalist Society invitee, raised questions about the Supreme Court's legitimacy, particularly in the context of its lowest favorability ratings from the public in over 50 years."
"Goldberg introduced a distinction made by former Law School Professor Richard Fallon regarding legal legitimacy versus moral legitimacy, questioning whether the Court's decisions are just."
A recent event titled "Is the Roberts Court Legitimate?" brought together conservative and progressive law scholars to discuss the Supreme Court's legitimacy. The event, part of the "From Dissent to Dialogue" series, aimed to foster understanding between differing ideological perspectives. Law School Dean John C.P. Goldberg emphasized the importance of learning from disagreements. The discussion highlighted the distinction between legal and moral legitimacy, especially in light of the Supreme Court's declining public favorability ratings.
Read at Harvard Gazette
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]