Senator John Kennedy expressed his approval of a recent Supreme Court decision that he believes is favorable for the American public. Discussing the implications of the ruling on universal injunctions, he criticized their legitimacy, stating that they lack foundational support in legal statutes, precedent, or common law. Kennedy highlighted that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent illustrated her frustration, suggesting it reflects well on the court decision. He indicated that the ruling has broader implications beyond just birthright citizenship, and he seems indifferent to criticisms from those who disagree with the ruling.
There's no basis in statute. There's no basis in Supreme Court precedent. There is no basis in English common law for universal injunctions.
If they disagree, I'm sorry. Fill out a hurt feelings report. Buy a comfort rock.
Collection
[
|
...
]