Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent highlights concerns that poorer school districts may struggle to legally challenge parental opt-outs, resulting in potential curriculum censorship. She argues that the ruling empowers certain parents to dictate educational content, undermining school boards' authority. Legal experts, including Deborah Jeon from the ACLU of Maryland, emphasize that allowing such exemptions further polarizes society by preventing exposure to diverse backgrounds. In contrast, conservative justices like Brett Kavanaugh assert the ruling merely permits parents to withdraw their children from lessons that conflict with their beliefs, not alter the curriculum itself.
In a fiery dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that for poorer school districts, it may be too costly to engage in lawsuits over opt-outs or spend funds tracking student absences.
In a time of ever-increasing polarization in our country, exemptions that would require schools to allow children to refuse exposure to materials and curriculum about people from various backgrounds is divisive and harmful.
They're not asking you to change what's taught in the classroom, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said during arguments. They're only seeking to be able to walk out.
Collection
[
|
...
]