Verizon is requesting permission to extend the duration for which phones can be locked to its network from 60 days to six months or longer. Advocacy groups have urged the FCC to reject this change, arguing that phone locking distorts market competition, increases costs, and leads to unnecessary e-waste. Consumer opinions also reflect concern that locked phones hinder their ability to switch carriers for better options. Several consumers expressed the view that ownership should enable the freedom to use devices across various networks, urging the FCC to protect these interests.
"Phone locking distorts market competition, raises switching costs, and contributes to unnecessary e-waste. It impedes consumers' ability to take full advantage of the devices they already own, forces them to purchase new phones unnecessarily, and reduces their freedom to choose more affordable or higher-quality service options."
"Verizon's argument that unlocked phones are against the public interest is just wrong. It stifles competition by making it harder to vote with your wallet and switch carriers."
"If you buy a phone, you should not be able to lock it down forever to a carrier. People have the option to change carriers for better coverage, price, customer service, etc."
Collection
[
|
...
]