The public-private myth: Why religion can't be kept behind closed doors
Briefly

Sir Edward Coke established the legal concept asserting that individuals have privacy in their own homes, influencing common law worldwide. The principle emphasizes that actions within one’s private space are one's own business, protected from unwarranted authority. Philosophers have historically argued for a separation between private and public spheres, especially regarding religion, advocating that while rational discourse belongs to public spaces, faith should remain private. However, philosopher Simon Critchley suggests the necessity of reevaluating this divide in contemporary society, noting the historical tensions that arise when personal beliefs conflict with public reasoning.
"An Englishman's home is his castle," asserting the principle that individuals have the right to privacy within their homes, free from unwarranted intrusion by authorities.
There exists a long philosophical tradition that emphasizes the distinction between private beliefs and public actions, where personal matters are meant to be kept out of the public sphere.
Philosopher Simon Critchley argues that the existing divide, which confines religious beliefs to the private sphere, is inadequate for our modern society.
The anxieties of thinkers like Martin Luther concerning private religious feelings becoming public highlight the historical struggle to balance personal belief and public rationality.
Read at Big Think
[
|
]