Ryan W. Powers was terminated from Davis Polk four hours after submitting a column on the Trump administration's monitoring of protesters. The law firm's policy prohibited employees from discussing topics they deemed relevant to their interests. Many large firms share similar policies, as noted by employment lawyer Jonathan Pollard. Law professor J.H. Verkerke stated that while restrictions on unauthorized comments are standard, it is unusual for such policies to result in firing for political speech. The firing could be linked to a desire to avoid offending the Trump administration.
Ryan W. Powers stated he was terminated shortly after presenting a column discussing the Trump administration's ability to monitor protesters. The law firm cited a policy that restricts employee speech on topics deemed relevant to its interests.
Employment lawyer Jonathan Pollard noted that many large law firms have similar speech restrictions. He mentioned that firms typically avoid discussing these publishing policies to evade negative perceptions.
J.H. Verkerke, a law professor, observed that while many firms restrict unauthorized public comments, it is unusual for such policies to lead to termination for political speech.
Verkerke suggested that the likely motivation behind the firing might have been the firm's intent to avoid offending the Trump administration.
Collection
[
|
...
]