Lawyers representing scientists are challenging the Trump administration's termination of NIH research grants through several court cases. These terminations, deemed 'unscientific' or misaligned with agency priorities, have raised concerns about potential violations of the constitutional separation of powers. The plaintiffs, comprising individual researchers and organizations, highlight the arbitrary nature of these cancellations, which affect critical research areas such as health disparities and LGBTQ+ issues. A pivotal hearing on June 16 will address the legality of these terminations, with potential implications for ongoing and future NIH research funding.
Lawyers representing scientists are pursuing court cases to reinstate NIH research grants terminated by the Trump administration, citing inadequate reasoning and constitutional violations.
The plaintiffs argue that the NIH's cancellation decisions are arbitrary and violate congressional mandates, affecting diverse research topics such as health disparities and vaccine hesitancy.
Collection
[
|
...
]