We Still Haven't Seen How Bad Gerrymandering Can Get
Briefly

We Still Haven't Seen How Bad Gerrymandering Can Get
"The Supreme Court overturned the requirement for states to draw majority-minority districts, stating that the Voting Rights Act prohibits gerrymandering only if it is done with the explicit goal of racial discrimination."
"Republican state legislatures in the South can now eliminate most blue House districts without fear of legal challenges, leading to a potential increase in hyper-partisan incumbents."
"The ruling's timing suggests modest effects for the upcoming midterms, as Louisiana has suspended its primary election to redraw its electoral map."
The Supreme Court's ruling in Louisiana v. Callais has significantly weakened constraints on partisan gerrymandering by stating that the Voting Rights Act only prohibits gerrymandering aimed at racial discrimination. This decision permits Republican state legislatures in the South to potentially erase Democratic districts. The ruling may lead to hyper-partisan incumbents dominating the House of Representatives, with voters losing representation. While the immediate effects on the upcoming midterms may be limited, states like Louisiana and Alabama are already considering redrawing electoral maps to consolidate power.
Read at The Atlantic
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]