Leaders often face challenges in guiding teams through uncertainty and disagreement, particularly when cognitive dissonance arises. The instinctive response to push for alignment may worsen resistance, leading team members to cling to their beliefs. Effective leadership requires alternative strategies, such as motivational interviewing, which involves asking open-ended questions, reflective listening, and affirming values. This approach encourages team members to express their concerns and encourages a dialogue that allows for change, rather than confronting resistance directly. Reframing mistakes as inevitable rather than as failures can also promote a healthier team dynamic.
Pushing harder often results in people holding more tightly to their existing beliefs, not less. When team members experience dissonance, their brain interprets it as a threat.
In complex systems, reframing mistakes as inevitable rather than incompetence can foster a more productive environment when leading teams through uncertainty and disagreement.
Collection
[
|
...
]